Legal Opinion

Tenenbaum v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1926No. 4528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

An indictment in seven counts was returned against plaintiff in error, Michael Tenenbaum, hereafter called defendant, and one S. Biyden, charging them with fraudulent use of the mail in violation of section 215, Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10385). The indictment is prolix and redundant, but, briefly stated, the scheme charged, with slight variations in the different counts, is this:

Biyden and Tenenbaum were to open up a wholesale and retail shoe store in Savannah, Ga., under the name of the Southern Shoe Company, and to establish a reputation for honesty and financial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Ralston v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Suetter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Garrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  5. Belisle v. LiskCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API