Trotta v. Ward
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the determination of the Commissioner reinstated and the certified question answered in the negative.
Disciplinary determinations by the Police Commissioner are entitled to substantial deference "because he, and not the courts, is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department” (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 445; see, Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 360). The Commissioner’s dismissal of a police officer for using illegal drugs is not so disproportionate to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Purdy v. KreisbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by58 opinions
- Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Soto v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Che Lin Tsao v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Montella v. BrattonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Colao v. Village of EllenvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.