Legal Opinion

United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 21, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEIGER, District Judge.

The indictment charges that defendants, “before and at the several times of committing the several offenses in this indictment hereinafter charged against them, devised a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and other property in the manner hereinafter described, from such members of a certain class of persons hereinafter referred to as the persons to be defrauded * * * whom said defendants could induce by means of certain false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, to purchase certain gold debenture bonds of the Wardman Realty &…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CaineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. United States v. Allied Chemical & Dye CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. United States v. GreveDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934
  4. United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Meador v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API