Legal Opinion

Madan v. Damiano

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1994No. A94A1159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Vito Damiano filed a complaint against Gobind Madan alleging breach of a lease agreement for failure to maintain and repair the premises. Madan filed a counterclaim alleging that Damiano entered into a prior settlement agreement between the parties in bad faith, that Damiano breached that agreement in various ways, that Damiano has caused Madan unnecessary trouble and expense, that Damiano has interfered with Madan’s contractual and business relations *737and that Damiano has defrauded Madan. Upon Damiano’s motion, the trial court ordered Madan to plead his counterclaim for fraud…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whiddon v. StargellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. CA-SHAR v. McKESSON CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Honester v. TinsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Givens v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Conte Enterprises, Inc. v. ROMAX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Little v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API