United States v. Blocker
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentEverett, Senior Judge
Reluctantly, I must dissent from both aspects of the majority opinion. Instead, I would set aside the guilty finding as to kidnapping and dismiss that Charge; and I would set aside the remaining findings, as well, and authorize a rehearing by a new panel of members.
I
The prosecution was required to prove that appellant had “willfully and wrongfully inveigle[d]” his victim in order to convict him of kidnapping. As the majority opinion correctly states, “ ‘Inveigle’ means to lure, lead astray, or entice by false representations or other deceitful means.” Para. 92c(1), Part IV, Manual for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. EberhardtU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.