Legal Opinion

Reynoldsville Distilling Company's License

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1907No. Appeal, No. 217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 217, April T., 1907, by the Reynoldsville Distilling Company, from order of Q. S. Jefferson Co., Jan. T.-, 1907, No. 47, refusing a distiller’s license. Application for a distiller’s license. Before Reed, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order refusing the appellant’s application for a distiller’s license. The order is in these words : “ January 28, 1907. After hearing and upon due consideration this application is refused.” It is urged that as no remonstrance was filed, and the petition, certificate and bond were in due form, the court’s refusal of the application, without expressing of record its reasons for so doing, was reversible error. So far as the determination of this question is concerned, there is no difference between such a case and a case where no fact or objection is stated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gross's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Johnson's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cochran's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Empire Brewing Company's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Indian Brewing Co.'s LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Lippincott's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Indian Brewing Co.'s LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API