Legal Opinion
Paulino v. Lifecare Transport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs action is barred by the exclusivity of the remedy under Workers’ Compensation Law § 11. JHHA submitted evidence demonstrating that defendants, as well as plaintiff’s nonparty employer, were all part of a single integrated entity in that they operated under the control of the same parent corporation, shared payroll services and an employee manual, and were covered by the same workers’ compensation insurance policy (see Hernandez v Sanchez, 40 AD3d 446 [2007]; Ramnarine v Memorial Ctr. for Cancer & Allied Diseases, 281 AD2d 218 [2001]). Although Lifecare failed to submit documentary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ramnarine v. Memorial Center for Cancer & Allied DiseasesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hernandez v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fuller v. KFG Land I, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Sulecki v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Demaj v. Pelham Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Faulk v. Rockaway One Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kassiano v. Palm Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.