Legal Opinion

Skinkle v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.

On February 6, 1927, George Skinkle, the petitioner for the mandamus order and a member of the police force of the city of Watervliet, was directed to investigate a complaint against James Quinn. Skinkle had no warrant for the arrest of Quinn. It is charged that he brutally assaulted Quinn and wounded his head with a “ billy; ” that he took Quinn to a doctor’s office, where his wounds were cared for, and then to the police station where he was held under arrest until February ninth, when he *303was discharged. Quinn died in the Troy Hospital February fifteenth from septicsemia which resulted from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Masterson v. . FrenchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. In re CruiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riley v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Jerry v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Wolf v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  4. De Boer v. LooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In re Charges against SkinkleNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API