Skinkle v. Murray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.
On February 6, 1927, George Skinkle, the petitioner for the mandamus order and a member of the police force of the city of Watervliet, was directed to investigate a complaint against James Quinn. Skinkle had no warrant for the arrest of Quinn. It is charged that he brutally assaulted Quinn and wounded his head with a “ billy; ” that he took Quinn to a doctor’s office, where his wounds were cared for, and then to the police station where he was held under arrest until February ninth, when he *303was discharged. Quinn died in the Troy Hospital February fifteenth from septicsemia which resulted from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Masterson v. . FrenchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In re CruiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riley v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Jerry v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Wolf v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- De Boer v. LooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- In re Charges against SkinkleNew York Supreme Court · 1927