Legal Opinion

Pro-Phy-Lac-Tic Brush Co. v. Hudson Products, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 4, 1949No. Civ. 9674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

1. This is an action alleging infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark “PermaGrip” brought under the Trademark Act of 1905, 15 U.S.C.A. § 96 (now revised 15 U.S.C.A. § 1114 et seq.).

2. Plaintiff is the owner of the registered trade-mark “Perma-Grip” for a denture powder for holding false teeth.

3. Defendant uses “Poli-Grip” as a trade-mark for a denture cream for holding false teeth.

4. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant from using “Poli-Grip” as a trade-mark for a denture cream and to recover damages.

5. The merchandise for which the trade-marks in question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. West Disinfecting Co. v. Lan-O-Sheen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  5. Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Model-Etts Corp. v. Merck & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Peter Pan Foundations, Inc. v. Beau-Bra Foundations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API