Pro-Phy-Lac-Tic Brush Co. v. Hudson Products, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
1. This is an action alleging infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark “PermaGrip” brought under the Trademark Act of 1905, 15 U.S.C.A. § 96 (now revised 15 U.S.C.A. § 1114 et seq.).
2. Plaintiff is the owner of the registered trade-mark “Perma-Grip” for a denture powder for holding false teeth.
3. Defendant uses “Poli-Grip” as a trade-mark for a denture cream for holding false teeth.
4. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant from using “Poli-Grip” as a trade-mark for a denture cream and to recover damages.
5. The merchandise for which the trade-marks in question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- West Disinfecting Co. v. Lan-O-Sheen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Model-Etts Corp. v. Merck & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Peter Pan Foundations, Inc. v. Beau-Bra Foundations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954