Schuster, Hingston & Co. v. Carson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Eillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Hutchinson, Carriers, see. 409; 2 Redfield, Railways, 132; O'Neal v. Garrett, 6 la., 480; Sutro v. Hoile, 2 Neb., 186; Steele v. Russell, 5 Id., 215; Grimison v. Russell, 11 Id., 469; (7., B. & Q. R. Co. v. Painter, 15 Id., 396; Symns v. Schotten, 35 Kan., 310 [10 Pac. Rep., 831]; Rogers v. Thomas, 20 Conn., 62; Reynolds v. Boston & M. R. Co., 43 N. H., 580; The Tigress, 32 L. J. [Eng.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Eillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Hutchinson, Carriers, see. 409; 2 Redfield, Railways, 132; O'Neal v. Garrett, 6 la., 480; Sutro v. Hoile, 2 Neb., 186; Steele v. Russell, 5 Id., 215; Grimison v. Russell, 11 Id., 469; (7., B. & Q. R. Co. v. Painter, 15 Id., 396; Symns v. Schotten, 35 Kan., 310 [10 Pac. Rep., 831]; Rogers v. Thomas, 20 Conn., 62; Reynolds v. Boston & M. R. Co., 43 N. H., 580; The Tigress, 32 L. J. [Eng. Adm.], 101; Calaban v. Babcock, 21 Ohio St., 281; 1 Benjamin, Sales, sec. 859. cited: 1 Parsons, Contracts [6th Ed.], pp.…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This is an action in replevin. The case was submitted to the court upon the following statement of facts:
“Schuster, Kingston & Co. v. Washington I. Carson.
“ It is hereby agreed and stipulated by and between the parties to the above entitled cause that the same shall be submitted on the following statement of facts: that the plaintiffs are a copartnership doing business at St. Joseph, Missouri; that on the 21st day of September, 1888, they sold to one A. Sands the goods and property which are the subject of this action, for the sum of $685.50, to be paid for in four months from that date, no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rucker v. FeiferlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Western Horse & Cattle Insurance v. TimmNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- O'Neil v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. J. Painter & SonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- U. S. Wind Engine & Pump Co. v. OliverNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bank of Havelock v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Crilly v. RuyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Ellis v. NilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Pokrok Zapadu Publishing Co. v. ZizkovskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.