Legal Opinion
Veitsman v. G & M Ambulette Service, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 26, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated November 16, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to renew the defendant’s prior motion to dismiss the complaint, which had been granted in an order of the same court dated July 6, 2004.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the propriety of the Supreme Court’s denial of the motion, in effect, for leave to renew is properly before this Court on appeal (see CPLR 5515 [1]). “A motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Renna v. GulloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- O'Connell v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Yarde v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- LaRosa v. TrapaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Guerrero v. Dublin Up Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bort v. PerperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rush v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Board of Managers of Anchorage Condominium v. HayniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Board of Managers of Anchorage Condominium v. HayniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013