Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 27, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

We think that Sec. 708.07 Fla. Statutes, 1941, is applicable and controls in this case. Except for this statute it is quite evident that in equity and good conscience Mrs. Gertrude Berlin should be required to perform the contract, but Sec. 708.07 supra, specifically provides that “No agreement for the sale or conveyance of real property or for relinquishment of dower shall be specifically enforced unless it be executed and acknowledged in the form prescribed for conveyance of her real property and for relinquishment of dower.”

Chapter 21932, Acts of 1943, in nowise, in our opinion,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rundel v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Rose v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Steinberg v. AlterSupreme Court of Florida · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. BerlinSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  2. Lindgren v. Van FleetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Williams v. NoelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Davis v. Fat Man's Bar-B-Que of Tallahassee, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Penn v. GinsburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API