Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. Grant

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2002No. 00-0625Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Enoch

filed a concurring opinion,

in which Justice JEFFERSON joined.

In Texas, absent actual knowledge, utilities are not liable for dangerous conditions on customers’ property.1 Because SWEP-CO had no actual knowledge of any dangerous condition on Grant’s property, it owed her no duty as a matter of law. I therefore agree with the Court’s judgment. But I am not prepared to go where the Court boldly goes. Because SWEPCO owed no duty, the Court need not decide whether SWEPCO’s tariff, which insulates it from liability for personal injury damages, is enforceable. That question I would not decide today.

I

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fort Bend County Drainage District v. SbruschTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Elliott-Williams Co., Inc. v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API