Legal Opinion
Continental Assurance Co. v. MacLeod-stedman, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 3, 1988No. 87 C 9834PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
This cause comes to be heard on the Amended Complaint of Continental Assurance Company (“CNA”), seeking a declaratory judgment that the terms and conditions of the issuance and exchange of securities contemplated by the Proposed Settlement described below are fair and therefore should be approved; that such issuance and exchange of securities should be exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) by virtue of the exception set forth in § 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Noriega Rodríguez v. Hernández ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Hege v. AEGON USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Chapel Investments, Inc. v. Cherubim Interests, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- In Re Board of Directors of Multicanal S.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006