Legal Opinion
Biederman v. O'Conner
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Second District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shops
This was a suit brought in the Knox circuit court, by plaintiff in error, against defendant in error, to recover damages for his failure to deliver 10,000 bushels of corn according to the terms of the following contract in writing:
“Galesburg, III., June 5, 1882.
“Mr. M. O’Conner promises to deliver Mr. H. A. Biederman 10,000 bushels of good corn, this fall of 1882, at twenty cents per bushel. M. O’Conner.”
The defendant filed the general issue and several special pleas, upon all of which issue was taken. A trial resulted in a verdict for defendant. Motions for new trial and in arrest were…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Kilcoin v. OrtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Glabman v. BouhallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Koester v. Northwestern Port Huron Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Yancey v. BoyceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.