Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2009No. 08-51047PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Norman Lamar Young — a sex offender — appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) for traveling in interstate commerce and then knowingly failing to update his registration information as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Young contends that, as applied to him, SORNA violates his constitutional right to be free from ex post facto punishment. It does not, so we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. SORNA Statutory Framework

On July 27, 2006, President George W. Bush signed into law the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. 1 Title I of the Act includes…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API