Legal Opinion

United States of America, and v. James Gilbert Hays

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1971No. 25949Published

1Per curiam

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We have not considered on the merits the point of the denial of the motion for new trial. At the time it was before the district court, that court had no jurisdiction to consider it. (The case was never remanded.) We assume the motion or another one may be regularly considered now.

Other points raised we have considered and find without merit.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arlander Petty, Penn Central Company, and Clark Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971