Legal Opinion

Wildearth Guardians v. Jewell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 19, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-1724Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : Civil Action No.: 16-1724 (RC) v. : : Re Document Nos.: 55, 60, 61, 62, 63, ZINKE, et al., : 71 : Defendants, : : WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, et al., : : Defendant-Intervenors : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF I. INTRODUCTION Climate change, and humanity’s ability to combat it, are increasingly prominent topics of public discourse. This case…

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API