Bostwick v. Carr
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal hy the plaintiff, Marie S. Bostwick, as executrix, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 17th day of September, 1914, vacating a warrant of attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas, J.:
The plaintiff attached personal property in New York belonging to the estate of Frank W. Carr, deceased, who was a resident of New Jersey, where the administratrix was appointed. The appeal is from an order vacating the attachment. The plaintiff would sustain the attachment under section 1836a of the Code of Civil Procedure, * which is: “ An executor or administrator duly appointed in any other State, Territory or district of the United States or in any foreign country may sue or be sued in any court in this State in his capacity of executor or administrator in like manner and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blood v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In re the Estate of BeresfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of WorchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
- In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
- Rogers v. GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.