Legal Opinion

Hankey v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 24, 2007No. 06-06-00172-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice MOSELEY.

In a trial consolidated with his codefen-dant, Saronna Little, the jury found Louie Matthew Hankey guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and assessed his punishment at fifty-five years’ imprisonment. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(a)(1)(B) (Vernon Supp.2006) (criminalizing aggravated sexual assault), § 12.32 (Vernon 2003) (defining punishment range for first-degree felonies). Hankey now appeals, asserting he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We affirm the judgment.

I. A Hearing on a Motion for New Trial Is Not a Prerequisite to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Saldana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  2. Jesus Perez Saldana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  3. Chad Michael Hays v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  4. Gayle Lynn Carey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  5. Hankey, Louie MatthewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API