Legal Opinion

Bell v. Dixie Furniture Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 22, 1985No. 22292PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Ada Bell brought suit against respondent Dixie Furniture Company, Inc. alleging the tort of outrage. The trial judge ruled the conduct complained of was not so outrageous and shocking to be actionable and granted summary judgment for respondent. We reverse.

Appellant bought furniture on an installment account from respondent promising to pay $15.23 per month. When her payments became delinquent, respondent initiated a claim and delivery action to recover the balance due, $42.59, and $25.00 court costs.

Respondent did not appear at the hearing. The magistrate ordered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Koren v. National Home Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. Baker v. Town of Sullivan's IslandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Folkens v. HuntCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Gilmore v. IveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Manley v. ManleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Gattison v. S.C. State CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API