Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lyons v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1984No. 82-12-38974; CA A27171Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNewman, J.

I concur with the majority insofar as it remands to the trial court to “address the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”1 Petitioner testified that his appointed counsel had not discussed with him the possibility of deportation. The attorney testified that he did not advise petitioner just before his plea of that possibility. The attorney also did not sign the certification attached to the plea petition that he had explained its effect and that it was “understandingly made.”

The record shows, moreover, that the printed text of the plea petition that petitioner signed is garbled. It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Gaffey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API