Legal Opinion
MacK v. Paragould & Hopkins Bridge Road Imp. Dist.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 11, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellants are the owners of real estate lying within the Paragould and Hopkins Bridge Road Improvement District No. One of Greene County, Arkansas, and have by this suit attacked the validity of that district.
It was alleged in the complaint which appellants filed that the district is void for the reason that, in the plans nnd specifications prepared by the State Highway Department and filed in the county court of Greene County, upon which the final petition signed by the landowners was predicated, as required by law, a bridge or viaduct is provided for extending from the west line of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Dyke v. MackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Bulloch v. Dermott-Collins Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Mullins v. City of Little BookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Mullins v. Commissioners of Bridge Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAdams v. HenleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Gray v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Greene County v. ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927