Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nickerson v. American States Insurance

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2000No. NonePublished

1DissentAmundson, Justice

[¶ 22.] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 23.] The essential issue on this appeal is the interpretation of SDCL 58-11-9.5 to determine whether Nickerson is entitled to recover UIM proceeds under her own $100,000 UIM policy with American States after having already received $50,000 from the tortfeasor and $50,000 from the primary UIM insurer. This statute provides,

Subject to the terms and conditions of such underinsured motorist coverage, the insurance company agrees to pay its own insured for uncompensated damages as its insured may recover on account of bodily injury or death arising out of - an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rydingsword v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Farmland Insurance Companies of Des Moines v. HeitmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kremer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API