Legal Opinion
Virginia M. Souther v. G.L. Mihlbachler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1983No. 82-2247PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Virginia M. Souther appeals from an order of the district court dismissing her petition seeking to enjoin the respondent, the District Director of the Internal Revenue Service, from collecting a penalty of $500 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6682. We affirm.
The petitioner filed in the district court a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” seeking a judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Professional Engineers, Inc., and Leroy T. Gravatte, III v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Crouch v. CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Louie N. Elias v. W.H. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Thomas More Law Center v. ObamaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Ross v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Seven-Sky v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.