Legal Opinion

Builders' Realty Corp. v. Bigelow

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 1, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed.

In thus deciding, however, we hold that the observation in the opinion of the Supreme Court that an appeal to the zoning board of adjustment is a necessary preliminary to recourse to the courts, when legal or constitutional questions are involved, is erroneous and must be overruled upon the authority of the cases in this court of H. Krumgold & Sons v. Jersey City, ante, p. 170, and Losick v. Binda, ante, p. 157.

In the Losick ease we held that zoning boards of adjustment were not created as appellate bodies and that legal or constitutional…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Lane v. BigelowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Gay v. City of LyonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. George v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API