Legal Opinion

Shipston Associates v. Esselte Pendaflex Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 12, 1996No. 94-8355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:

This appeal involves a sale-leaseback transaction gone awry. The parties appeal from the final judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, granting in part and denying in part the parties’ motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court in part and reverse in part.

I

A

The essential facts are not in dispute. In 1967, Dymo Industries, the predecessor of appellant Esselte Pendaflex Corp. (collectively “Esselte”), entered into a deal with Durs-ley Properties (“Dursley”) for the sale and leaseback of a factory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michael Lee Sammons v. Maury Taylor, Six Unidentified Fbi Agents or Department of Justice Employees United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. The Reserve, Ltd. v. Town of Longboat KeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Trust Co. v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Currin v. MilhollinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shipston Associates v. Esselte Pendaflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API