Legal Opinion
Hatch v. McBrien
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.
This case was commenced in justice^ court, where the plaintiff filed the following declaration:
“Now comes the said plaintiff, and complains of the said defendant, who has been summoned to answer the plaintiff in a plea of trespass on the case on promises, for that heretofore, to wit, on the 1st day of April, 1889, the said plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant, and as the agent and broker of defendant, purchased for the account of defendant a large quantity of canned goods, to wit, 200 dozen of tomatoes, and 200 dozen of corn, and caused the said goods to be brought to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Wiger v. CarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Foley v. NimocksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Windsor Steel Products, Ltd. v. Whizzer Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
- Wachob, Bender & Co. v. Omaha Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935