Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKennedy, J.
{¶ 109} I agree with most of the opinion of Justice Pfeifer; however, I do not join ¶ 49 through 59. While I agree with the ultimate conclusion that the action brought against Sandra Taylor Jarvis was untimely, I disagree with the analysis regarding when the cause of action against her accrued, including the opinion’s discussion of Ohio’s borrowing statute. Because a credit-card account is an account founded upon contract, with a single and indivisible liability arising from individual transactions that are connected as a series, the issue of when the cause of action accrued is resolved by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dudek v. Thomas & Thomas Attorneys & Counselors at Law, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Arthur v. ParenteauOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- R.N.C., Inc. v. TsegeletosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Citibank v. HyslopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.