Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2016No. 2013-0118Published

1ConcurrenceKennedy, J.

{¶ 109} I agree with most of the opinion of Justice Pfeifer; however, I do not join ¶ 49 through 59. While I agree with the ultimate conclusion that the action brought against Sandra Taylor Jarvis was untimely, I disagree with the analysis regarding when the cause of action against her accrued, including the opinion’s discussion of Ohio’s borrowing statute. Because a credit-card account is an account founded upon contract, with a single and indivisible liability arising from individual transactions that are connected as a series, the issue of when the cause of action accrued is resolved by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dudek v. Thomas & Thomas Attorneys & Counselors at Law, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. Smither v. Asset Acceptance, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Arthur v. ParenteauOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. R.N.C., Inc. v. TsegeletosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Citibank v. HyslopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API