Legal Opinion
First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 4, 1942No. 7996PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
On February 28, 1935 the United States entered into a contract with William Eisenberg & Sons Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, to build a dam in Ohio. As required by the Heard Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270, the contractor furnished a bond on which the defendant, the 2Etna Casualty and Surety Company, was surety, to secure performance of the work and payment of claims for labor and materials. The application for the bond provided that the contractor “assign [s], * * * all the deferred payments and retained percentages * * * and all monies * * * that may be due and payable to * *…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States of America for the Use of Dakota Electric Supply Company, Anorth Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- National Surety Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Hiller & Skoglund, Inc. v. Atlantic Creosoting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.