Legal Opinion

In re Hediger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 17, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-223, concluding that DANIEL D. HEDIGER of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safekeep property), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to *106promptly deliver funds to a third party), RPC 7.5(d) (improper use of firm name), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit proof to the Office of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HedigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API