Legal Opinion

George L. Brooks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1974No. 73--2195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The motion to modify the judgment, 6 Cir., 497 F.2d 1059 having come on to be heard; and it appearing that the mandate herein has issued; and it further appearing that the United States Supreme Court in Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855, decided June 26, 1974, held that although the Federal Youth Corrections Act requires an express finding that the offender will not benefit from its provisions, it does not require that the finding be accompanied by supporting reasons; and it appearing for this reason that the mandate of this court should be recalled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. George L. Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin T. Goodwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. John Edward McKnabb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Midway Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1076, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,264 Midway Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission and Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API