Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

THE defendants in.error brought an action of trover in the supreme court, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the value of certain wines and brandies, which the defendants in error alleged to be their property.

Read the full summary

THE defendants in.error brought an action of trover in the supreme court, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the value of certain wines and brandies, which the defendants in error alleged to be their property. The The cause vvas triplaintiffs in error pleaded not guilty. ecj aj. a c;rcu¡t COUrt, in the city of New-Tork, on the IOth day of January, 1803, when the jury found a special verdict, in which the following facts are stated : The defendants in error, underwrote two policies of insurance, for gt0,000, on goods shipped by the plaintiffs in error, at, and from New-Tork to Cadiz,…

1Opinion of the Court

The majority of the court being of the same opinion ; It waSi thereupon, ordered and adjudged, that the judgment given in the supreme court be affirmed, with double costs, and damages, and that the record be nmitted, &c.

Judgment of affirmance.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Church v. Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1817
  3. Holbrook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API