Legal Opinion
Rudow v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 3, 1986No. 86 CIV 0961 (LBS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Norman Rudow, brings this action against Lois Whitman, the City of New York and its Commission on Human Rights (“the Commission”), alleging three grounds for relief. Plaintiffs first and third claims are brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and allege that his “due process” rights under the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution were violated by defendant Whitman’s conduct during certain Commission proceedings, subsequent state court proceedings, and occasions related thereto. Plaintiff’s second claim for relief charges the same…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Yalkowsky v. Century Apartments AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Norman Rudow v. The City of New York, the City of New York Commission on Human Rights, and Lois WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Polanco v. NCO Portfolio Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Thomas v. County of PutnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Mazzone v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.