Legal Opinion
United States v. Masel
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 7, 1999No. 98-10014-X-01PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CROCKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
OPINION
This case presents a First Amendment challenge to various aspects of a regulatory scheme that requires certain groups and individuals to obtain a permit prior to using or occupying National Forest System land. Plaintiff United States has charged defendant Bennett Masel with violating a regulation that prohibits non-commercial groups of 75 or more persons from occupying National Forest System land without first applying for and receiving a special use permit. 36 C.F.R. § 261.10(k). The alleged violation occurred in early…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Joan H. Kalb, in No. 00-1733 United States of America v. Garrick M. Beck, in No. 00-1734 United States v. Stephen M. Sedlacko, in No. 00-1746Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. McFaddenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
- Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson County, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. KalbDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.