Abigail Ginsberg v. Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated (076288)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
When a conflict-of-law question arises in the setting of a personal injury case, New Jersey courts have used principles set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws (1971) (Restatement). P.V. ex rel. T.V. v. Camp Jaycee, 197 N.J. 132, 135-36, 962 A.2d 453 (2008); see also Erny v. Estate of Merola, 171 N.J. 86, 95-97, 792 A.2d 1208 (2002) (employing Restatement factors in choice-of-law analysis); Fu v. Fu, 160 N.J. 108, 119, 733 A.2d 1133 (1999) (same). The Restatement directs a three-step determination. First, the court ascertains whether there is a genuine conflict between the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- ALFRED LAWSON VS. OFFICER JEFF DEWAR (L-8788-20, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- JASON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- MAHER v. BAUMEISTER & SAMUELS, P.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Samuel Mejia v. Quest Diagnostics (082739) (Essex County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020