Wood v. Mandrilla
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action in ejectment to recover a strip of ten acres of land, part of the southwest quarter of section 30, township 20 south, range 24 east, in Tulare County. This quarter section was originally government land—the fractional quarter section containing 178.98 acres as returned by the surveyor under the government survey, but as shown by the evidence in the case in fact contains about one hundred and eighty acres. This quarter section, under one entry and as one tract, was patented in 1872 to the predecessor in title of plaintiff. On October 22, 1909, plaintiff, while still the owner…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cogan v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Edinger v. WoodkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Fair v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. KuglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Weber v. GranerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hoyne v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933