State v. Gray
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Chief Justice.
Defendant, Robert Dale Gray, appeals from judgment on jury verdict finding him guilty of rape, in violation of Code section 698.1. He first asserts his motion for directed verdict should have been sustained because the evidence did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt the act of intercourse was by force, without complainant’s consent and that she resisted to her utmost ability. Secondly, he ' contends he did not receive a fair trial. We affirm.
*307Other than as to force, consent and resistance the testimony of complainant and defendant is in little conflict. Complainant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- State v. SchurmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. HoloubekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- State v. LadehoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DahlstromSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. DeweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.