Legal Opinion

Ryder v. Shea

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1913No. 22,460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Vigo Circuit Court; Charles M. Fortune, Judge. Appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver without notice, and motion by appellees to dismiss the appeal. (For decision on the merits see Ind. .)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

*575 1.

*574The appeal here is from an interlocutory order, appointing a receiver without notice, jurisdiction of *575which is vested in this court. Subd. 17, §1392 Burns 1908, Acts 1907 p. 237. The record shows that on September 2, 1913, the trial court, on motion of appellees, without notice to appellants, appointed a receiver. The next morning appellant Ryder appeared and prayed an appeal to this court, and perfected his appeal as required hy §1289 Burns 1908, §1231 R. S. 1881. Before taking the appeal, no exception was reserved to the action of the trial court. On October 11, 1913, appellees filed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hooper v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Kempton Lodge, No. 482 v. MozingoIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Nevills v. ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metsker v. WhitsellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kempton Lodge, No. 482 v. MozingoIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Markley v. FrantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API