Legal Opinion

Doe v. Ettenheim

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 9, 1939:

Wicichem, J.

The question upon this appeal is whether the powers vested by decedent’s will in the original trustee are personal and discretionary or imperative in character. If personal and discretionary, it is clear from the authorities that they may not be exercised by the successor trustee.

“If upon such construction of the instrument it appears that a power lodged with the trustees in connection with the trust is a special confidence reposed in this particular trustee or set of trustees, or is to be exercised only upon his or their personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Osborne v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butt v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Norris v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Welch v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Brownell v. LeutzDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
  5. First Trust Co. v. CochraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API