Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. Dan Nance Corporation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 1980No. 21166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

The basic question in this appeal is whether appellant properly exercised his option to renew a lease of real estate. The lower court held that appellant failed to exercise the option to renew the lease and denied his request for specific performance. Appeal is from that order.

On October 9, 1962, a lease agreement was entered into between Phillips Petroleum Company, as Lessee, and Dan W. Nance and his wife, as Lessors, wherein a lot in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, was leased for a term of'fifteen (15) years, with the option to renew the lease for three (3) successive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. DewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Montague Corporation v. Burton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shupe v. SettleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Earle v. AycockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Alala v. Peachtree Plantations, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API