Legal Opinion

Geraghty v. Geraghty

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1989No. S89A0343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

We granted discretionary appeal to determine whether certain language in an alimony agreement was sufficient to accomplish a waiver of the right to seek modification. The language in question is: “The parties herein waive their Statutory right to a modification now and forever.”

1. The rule stated in Varn v. Varn, 242 Ga. 309, 311 (1) (248 SE2d 667) (1978) is:

[P]arties to an alimony agreement may obtain modification unless the agreement expressly waives the right of modification by referring specifically to that right; the right to modification will be waived by agreement of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Varn v. VarnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Brenizer v. BrenizerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Ashworth v. BusbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Carlos v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Cannon v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Ashworth v. BusbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API