Legal Opinion

Schulder v. Ellis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. 4793Published

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This case is here on a second appeal. The facts are fully-set forth in the opinion rendered in 66 Utah 418, 243 P. 377, 383, and will not be repeated here. The proceeding is one in equity for an accounting between former partners of a law firm. The case was remanded for the taking of testimony, making of findings, and conclusions with respect to one item only. That item was a $40,000 fee which was paid Messrs. William H. Dickson and Adrian C. Ellis, Jr., for services rendered to the Silver King Coalition Mines Company in the Silver King Conkling Case. On the former appeal it was determined…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forbes v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Schulder v. DicksonUtah Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API