Legal Opinion
Dalton Equipment Company, Inc., Creditor-Appellee v. Charles E. Brown, AKA Charles Elmer Brown, Debtor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1979No. 77-1726PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERR, Senior District Judge:
This is an appeal from a district court decision reversing a bankruptcy court’s denial of a creditor’s motion to extend time to object to discharge.
On March 8, 1974, Brown filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy. He was adjudged a bankrupt. On March 15 the court ordered that the first meeting of creditors would be held on April 2. This same order fixed July 1, 1974 as the last date for the filing of objections to determine the dischargeability of debts.
The schedule of assets filed by the bankrupt included an entry as follows:(c) Fish meal venture — informal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merle's Inc. v. SynogroundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Tefft, Weller & Co. v. MunsuriSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Gene Paul Master, Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupts-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Young Properties Corp. v. United Equity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Christ's Church of the Golden RuleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re International Environmental Dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re LLOYD, CARR AND CO., Etc. Et Al., Bankrupts. Appeal of NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. Et Al.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Salomon v. LoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities Benton Rural Electric Association Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association Umatilla Electric Eastern Oregon Irrigators Association, Puget Sound Energy Avista Corporation Pacific Northwest Generating Company (Pngc) Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp Portland General Electric Company, Respondent-Intervenor. Public Utility District No. 1 of Benton County Public Utility District No. 1 of Cowlitz County Public Utility District No. 1 of Franklin County Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County Public Utility District No. 1 of Grays Harbor County Public Utility District No. 1 of Pendoreille County the City of Seattle Seattle City Light Department (Generating Public Utilities) Public Power Council, Pacific Northwest Generating Company (Pngc) Puget Sound Energy Avista Corporation Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp Portland General Electric Company, Respondent-Intervenor. Alcoa, Inc., Pacific Northwest Generating Company (Pngc) Puget Sound Energy Avista Corporation Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Pacificorp Portland General Electric Company, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005