Legal Opinion
Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 19, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 81-1101-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, District Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether prejudgment interest should be awarded under Mass.Gen.L. ch. 231, § 6C on a recovery based upon quantum meruit. On July 12, 1989, a jury returned a verdict for the Defendant Raytheon Company on Plaintiff Merle J. Bushkin and Bushkin Associates’ (“Bushkin”) breach of contract claims and for Bushkin on his quantum meruit claim.1 On July 17, 1989, Raytheon filed a Motion to Alter or Amend the Verdict on the grounds that Mass.Gen.L. ch. 231, § 6C,2 which provides for the calcula*19tion of interest “[i]n all actions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Perkins School for the Blind v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Mill Pond Associates, Inc. v. E & B Giftware, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990