Legal Opinion
In re Corry M.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 1999No. 98-L-033PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William M. O’Neill, Judge.
The following appeal is from a judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, which prevented appellant, the state of Ohio, from presenting the hearsay statements made by an alleged child victim to a social worker investigating claims that the child was sexually abused by appellee, Corry M.1 (d.o.b. March 27, 1984) and his twin brother, Dustin M. The state alleged that the hearsay statements were admissible pursuant to Evid.R. 803(4) and 807. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts pertinent to this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ButcherOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Davison v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Griffith, Unpublished Decision (12-19-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GoingsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Brown, 2007-P-0014 (2-29-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.