Legal Opinion

Vermeule v. Vermeule

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 1, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions by defendant. Assumpsit upon a promissory note. At the close of the testimony the presiding justice ruled that no defense had been made and directed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff for $2946.67, the amount agreed to be due, if anything.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.

This is a suit upon the defendant’s promissory note made in the state of New York, January 24, 1897, for the sum of $2500, with interest at six per cent per annum. It was not in controversy that the note was given in • renewal of several other notes previously given for money lent at different times; and evidence was introduced, in behalf of the defendant, tending to show that the earliest one of these prior notes, which formed the consideration of the note in suit, contained a clause which gave the plaintiff the option to take certain stock in a New Jersey corporation, in addition to six per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  2. Miller v. HullNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Kilbourn v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter and Carter v. Leon Loan and Finance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Succession of MorereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Succession of MorereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API