Weissman v. Volino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit to foreclose a mortgage of real estate, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by one of the defendants, the Hubbell and Merwin Company, who claimed that a mechanic’s lien held by it took precedence of the plaintiff’s mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
In September, 1909, the defendant Volino applied to the plaintiff f'or a loan of $1,100 for the purpose of paying for a building lot and erecting a house thereon. Weissman secured a deed of a lot in Hamden, Connecticut, made directly to Volino, and on September 9th, 1909, Volino gave his promissory note for $1,100 to the plaintiff, payable four months after date. The payment of this note was secured by a mortgage of the same date upon the lot. The consideration for the note and mortgage consisted of a bonus of $200, the purchase price of the lot, $375, and the promises of the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beach v. OsborneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Ensign v. BattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Crane v. DemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- Hamilton v. NuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Matz v. ArickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Lampson Lumber Co. v. ChiarelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Stein v. Davidson.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Bristol Lumber Co. v. DerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- In the Matter of American Metal Products Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Arthur B. Weiss, Trustee-Appellant, Walter E. Heller Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.