Legal Opinion

REDEVELOPMENT AUTH., KANSAS CITY v. State Corp. Comm.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 24, 1951No. 38,574, 38,575PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The questions considered and determined in this opinion arise from two actions originally commenced on the same day in this court, and which, because the same statutes are involved, were consolidated for presentation and argument.

Although more detailed reference to the pleadings will be made hereafter to the extent necessary, it suffices here to say that in No. 38,574, Redevelopment Authority of the City of Kansas City, hereafter referred to as the Authority, seeks a writ of mandamus against the State Corporation Commission, hereafter…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  2. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Rambo v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. STATE, EX REL. v. Urban Renewal Agency of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. City of Lawrence v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Common School District No. 6 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. McDonald v. Joint Rural High School District No. 9Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Missouri Pacific Rld. Co. v. Board of County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API