Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Huston
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 22, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 N.J. 472 (1972)
291 A.2d 129
ROMANUS J. BUCKLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FULTON B. HUSTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 10, 1972.
Decided May 22, 1972.
Mr. Albert J. Persichetti, Deputy City Solicitor of Philadelphia, and a member of the Pennsylvania bar, argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Tort and Daniels, attorneys).
Mr. Martin F. McKernan argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Martin F. McKernan, Jr., on the brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by JACOBS, J.
The plaintiff, as Revenue Commissioner of the Department of Collections of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. ChildsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- City of Philadelphia v. StadlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- City of Philadelphia v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Gould v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
- City of Philadelphia v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.